Review – Tamron 100-400mm lens
Taking photos with a telephoto lens usually means compromises. They are often too heavy to just hand hold and you have to use a monopod or tripod. They can come with a very expensive price tag which makes them out of the range of most people. Tamron have come up with a compromise.
Review – Tamron 100-400mm lens
The Tamron 100-400mm f/4.5-6.3 Di VC USD Lens is that perfect compromise. It is easy to use, light and doesn’t cost a lot of money.
Full frame lens
The lens is made for full frame cameras, but that doesn’t mean you can’t use it with cropped sensors as well. Perhaps it is better for the latter as it will make it a much longer lens. However, for most people being out to zoom to 400mm is often enough.
It is good for photographing birds, or animals at the zoo. If you want to photograph people playing sports then it would be perfect for you.
If you want to get further with it you can pair it with one of Tamron’s teleconverters.
Not very heavy
Most lenses that go to 400mm are often very heavy it makes them harder to use. This lens is no where near as heavy. This lens weighs just over a kilo, compared with almost 4 kilos for a 400 mm 2.8 lens.
If you are using the heavier lens you really need to have it on a monopod or tripod. They are too heavy to hold up, but this lens is light enough that you can hold it up without too much trouble. The Vibration Compensation makes it even easier.
Can use it without a monopod or tripod
It is nice to go out with a lens and use it without the aid of a tripod or monopod. The light weight means it is easy to hold it up and just use it. Well it may not have the speed that something like the 150-600mm has, it is easier to use and move around.
If you have used big lenses then you will understand how having to use a monopod or tripod with a lens can make the experience harder. If you like to move freely and just take images then you will like this lens.
Good quality images
Good for people who are seriously into wildlife or sports photography, but can’t afford the really expensive long lenses. In Australia the lens is around $1200. That makes it a lot more affordable than the other big lenses.
The images are good and it is great to see what you can get. Having the widest aperture of f/6.3 at 400mm is a bit disappointing, but you can’t expect too much for that price range. I didn’t find it too disappointing.
I really enjoyed using the lens. I liked what I was able to get with it. Though the thing that really got me was the size and weight. I know if I had a 150-600mm I would hardly use it. It would too big and heavy to just carry around for me. I liked how easy it was to put in the bag and just put on the camera ready to take photos. Not having to use some sort of support was also fantastic.
So, would I buy the lens?
I think I would, if I did more wildlife photography. Unfortunately, I don’t do a lot, so it isn’t something I can justify spending the money on. I have to be so careful with what lenses I buy, and I really need to be able to justify which ones I want.
I do think if you loved doing that sort of photography then you would love this lens. It would be a great lens to get if you were interested in wildlife or sport photography, but not really sure you want to spend money on really expensive lenses.